Re: TODO: GNU TLS
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1167495256.1268.0.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: TODO: GNU TLS (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: TODO: GNU TLS
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > This would be the big feature I think is missing from our current SSL
> > support. I don't think it'd be terribly difficult to support with
> > either library (I think most of the work would be on the PG user auth
> > side, which would be useable by either).
>
> Wouldn't it be a lot more logical to support authentication with X.509
> certificates rather than PGP keys?
The use of PGP in this manner is silly imo. X.509 would certainly be
interesting.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: