Re: TODO: GNU TLS
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1167495256.1268.0.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TODO: GNU TLS (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: TODO: GNU TLS
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > This would be the big feature I think is missing from our current SSL > > support. I don't think it'd be terribly difficult to support with > > either library (I think most of the work would be on the PG user auth > > side, which would be useable by either). > > Wouldn't it be a lot more logical to support authentication with X.509 > certificates rather than PGP keys? The use of PGP in this manner is silly imo. X.509 would certainly be interesting. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: