Re: User defined I/O conversion casts
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: User defined I/O conversion casts |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11671.1225373857@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: User defined I/O conversion casts (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: User defined I/O conversion casts
Re: User defined I/O conversion casts |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Yeah, a magical OID clearly has some issues. A new field in pg_cast is
> the obvious alternative. How about adding a "castmethod" char field,
> with values:
> b = binary-compatible cast (CREATE CAST ... WITHOUT FUNCTION)
> i = I/O coercion cast (the new beast, CREATE CAST ... WITH INOUT)
> f = use cast function specified in castfunc field.
> castfunc is 0 for methods b and i.
Seems sane to me. If you do that, please add a check in the opr_sanity
regression test that castfunc is nonzero if and only if castmethod is f.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: