Re: Size of Path nodes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Size of Path nodes
Дата
Msg-id 11670.1449252454@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Size of Path nodes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2015-12-04 12:50:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> which means Robert has already blown the planner's space consumption out
>> by close to a factor of 2, and I should stop worrying.

> FWIW, for me it's still <= 64 bytes:

No, it's not bare Path I'm worried about, it's IndexPath, which went
from 128 bytes in previous versions to 136 in HEAD.  Likewise for
BitmapHeapPath, TidPath, ForeignPath, AppendPath, ResultPath,
MaterialPath, and possibly others.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Size of Path nodes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items