Re: effective_cache_size vs units
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1166504182.22487.36.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size vs units (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: effective_cache_size vs units
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 23:46 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > > Oh, you mean MB vs Mb. Man, it had to be that simple :) > > ISTM we had discussed whether guc.c should accept units strings in > a case-insensitive manner, and the forces of pedantry won the first > round. Shall we reopen that argument? I don't think that anyone is going to think, oh I am using 1000 Mega Bit of ram. Mb == MB in this case. That being said, it is documented and I don't know that it makes that much difference as long as the documentation is clear. Hmm perhaps perhaps a quick statement to the effect of what is legal in the postgresql.conf? E.g; # # When setting memory parameters you may used a shortened sytanx e.g., # 1024MB or 1GB is 1 Gigabyte of ram. Note that MB/GB is capitalized. # Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: