Re: effective_cache_size vs units
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: effective_cache_size vs units |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1166476513.28377.12.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: effective_cache_size vs units (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 22:08 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Is there any special reason why I can't use "Mb" and "Gb" and such > > for effective_cache_size, the way I can for say shared_buffers? > > You can't use "Mb" or "Gb" for shared_buffers either, because those are > not accepted units. Magnus, Here is a link that may help: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/config-setting.html It looks like it is very pedantic about the input it can receive. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: