On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 16:23 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > To be fair, he was running the cluster on a 100Mbps network. Depending
> > on his setup, that may have been his bottleneck. However, there's a good
> > chance that's not his only problem. Especially if he's so sold on MySQL
> > Cluster that he's trying to find a place to use it.
>
> No, read on, he upgraded to gigabit halfway through the thread, and went
> from 50 to 70 tps.
>
Wow, that's bad. This debunks the myth that native replication is
inherently easier to use or inherently better in some way. They spent a
whole thread talking about it, and still couldn't get half the
performance of a single PG box.
Regards,
Jeff Davis