On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 13:36 -0500, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter,
>
> > First of all, moving to DocBook XML will not do anything in the way of
> > improving our output processing abilities. Any tool that you can use
> > on DocBook SGML can also be used on DocBook XML and vice versa.
> >
>
> As I said then, this is absolutely untrue.
You are correct Josh. I am not sure why Peter ignores this simple fact.
> OpenOffice.org, for example,
> works with DocBook XML but not SGML. There are also a plethora of XML
> editing and publishing tools which can been used for Docbook XML which
> are not available for SGML. A simple look at this page:
> http://wiki.docbook.org/topic/DocBookAuthoringTools
> .... shows that there are more than twice as many authoring tools which
> support only XML as support SGML -- and that most of the tools which
> support SGML are out-of-maintenance.
Yep.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> --Josh Berkus
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate