Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen
Дата
Msg-id 1165.1334757230@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't override arguments set via options with positional argumen  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> My vote is to revert this altogether and leave it be.  In the
> alternative, make it an error.

You mean in HEAD too?  I don't agree with that, for sure.  What this
patch is accomplishing is to make sure that the less-commonly-used
programs have similar command-line-parsing behavior to psql and pg_dump,
where we long ago realized that failure to check this carefully could
result in very confusing behavior.  (Especially on machines where
getopt is willing to rearrange the command line.)

I agree with Andrew that this is a bug fix.  I can see the argument
for not applying it to back branches, but not for declaring that it's
not a bug.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug tracker tool we need
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql: tab completions for 'WITH'