Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1164217913.2868.35.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper' (Markus Schiltknecht <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 18:42 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote: > Hi, > > Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > PostgreSQL doesn't ship a integrated replication solution, BECAUSE not > > any one replication solution can fit the need. > > Yes, that's what I'm saying. > > Please do not mix cause and effect: no replication solution got into > core because none fit all the needs. It's not that we have a policy > stating that we don't want any replication solution in core. What could > possibly be the reasons for such a policy? Because there will never be a solution that can fit the need? Slony and replicator are only similar in that they both are asynchronous master-slave solutions, other than that, we are vastly different and serve very different needs. PgCluster would be a good choice for specific workloads but is a bad choice for many workloads. uni/cluster is fine if you want a web app and no database logic. The list goes on, and on. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake > > Regards > > Markus > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: