On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:28 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Mammoth Replicator is not synchronous anyway ...
> >
> > That's a shame. I thought we might be able get a head start in that way.
>
> Huh? Why should that be a shame?
Because I wanted it to be synchronous and it is not...
> Do you have anything better to propose?
On -hackers, I think, but not yet.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com