Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1162783524.5692.371.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: adminpack and pg_catalog (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 22:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog. AFAICS, > adminpack doesn't have any special requirements, so it should behave > like all other contrib modules. Where are we on this? When this topic was last discussed, the three alternatives were: (1) Modify contrib/adminpack to not use the pg_catalog schema, per the consensus that contrib/ packages installingobjects into that schema is broken behavior (2) Don't modify contrib/adminpack, for the sake of backward compatibility (3) Remove contrib/adminpack from the Postgres distribution I think the discussion was edging toward #3, but #2 is the only option that I'm not happy with. Any other opinions out there? Cheers, Neil
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: