Re: Extended protocol logging

On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> With what logging settings?  log_duration has rather different behavior
> >> from what it used to do.
> 
> > I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> > in the protocol section,
> 
> The contents of the postmaster log are surely not part of the FE protocol.
> Clients can't even see the log without resorting to nonstandard hacks.

OK, can we please put the example from -hackers into the docs,
somewhere, with particular note of which protocol messages result in
which logging output?

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com