Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11612.1406009729@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using OR'd conditions (johno <jan.suchal@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Slow query with indexed ORDER BY and LIMIT when using
OR'd conditions
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
johno <jan.suchal@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> johno <jan.suchal@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The obvious query is
>>> SELECT * FROM register_uz_accounting_entities
>>> WHERE effective_on > '2014-07-11' OR (effective_on = '2014-07-11' AND
>>> id > 1459)
>>> ORDER BY effective_on, id
>>> LIMIT 100
>> A more readily optimizable query is
>> SELECT * FROM register_uz_accounting_entities
>> WHERE (effective_on, id) > ('2014-07-11'::date, 1459)
>> ORDER BY effective_on, id
>> LIMIT 100
> Yes, but that query has completely different semantics - I can't change
> that.
No, it doesn't. Read it again ... or read up on row comparisons,
if you're unfamiliar with that notation. The above queries are
exactly equivalent per spec.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: