Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От alexei.vladishev@gmail.com
Тема Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Дата
Msg-id 1160627985.755556.44770@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: more anti-postgresql FUD  (snacktime <snacktime@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
> > 1. create table test (id int4, aaa int4, primary key (id));
> > 2. insert into test values (0,1);
> > 3. Execute "update test set aaa=1 where id=0;" in an endless loop
> >
> > I just did the test on PostgreSQL 7.4.12 and MySQL 5.0.22 (MyISAM,
> > sorry had no configured InnoDB). Ubuntu 6.0.6, AMD64, 2GB, default
> > database settings.
> >
> > MySQL performs very well, approximately 15000-20000 updates per second
> > with no degradation of performance.
> >
> > PostgreSQL does approximately 1600 records per second for the first
> > 10000, then 200rps for the first 100k records, and then slower and
> > slower downgrading to 10-20 rps(!!!) when reaching 300k.
>
> Something is wrong with your test code.  If I had to guess I would say
> you did all the updates in a single transaction without committing
> them, in which case yes it will slow down until you commit.

No, I'm not doing all the updates in a single transaction. Is it so
hard to repeat my test in your environment? :) It would take 5min to
see my point.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Ye Qin"
Дата:
Сообщение: problem with using O_DIRECT
Следующее
От: alexei.vladishev@gmail.com
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD