Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mark Lewis
Тема Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
Дата
Msg-id 1158867714.9657.1680.camel@archimedes
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as  ("Bucky Jordan" <bjordan@lumeta.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
> So this might be a dumb question, but the above statements apply to the
> cluster (e.g. postmaster) as a whole, not per postgres
> process/transaction correct? So each transaction is blocked waiting for
> the main postmaster to retrieve the data in the order it was requested
> (i.e. not multiple scanners/aio)?

Each connection runs its own separate back-end process, so these
statements apply per PG connection (=process).

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Bucky Jordan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as
Следующее
От: Markus Schaber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large tables (was: RAID 0 not as fast as