Re: Simplifying "standby mode"
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Simplifying "standby mode" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1158137328.2692.581.camel@holly обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Simplifying "standby mode" (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 16:23 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > >>> My memory is lousy at the best of times, but when have we had a minor > >>> release that would have broken this due to changed format? > > >> Not often, which is why I mention the possibility of having > >> interoperating minor release levels at all. If it was common, I'd just > >> put a blanket warning on doing that. > > > I don't know that it's happened in the past but I wouldn't be surprised. > > Consider that the bug being fixed in the point release may well be a bug in > > WAL log formatting. > > This would be the exception, not the rule, and should not be documented > as if it were the rule. It's not really different from telling people > to expect a forced initdb at a minor release: you are simply > misrepresenting the project's policy. OK, that's clear. I'll word it the other way around. SGML'd version will go straight to -patches. -- Other Questions and Changes:: please shout them in now. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: