Re: "stack depth limit exceeded" executing DELETE FROM
От | Mark Lewis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "stack depth limit exceeded" executing DELETE FROM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1157482833.9657.737.camel@archimedes обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | "stack depth limit exceeded" executing DELETE FROM ("Cox, Brian" <Brian.Cox@ca.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Not a limit to a single DELETE per se, a single delete could remove millions of rows, but you can't specify that many individual entries in an IN (..) section. This isn't a PG-specific issue by the way; Oracle limits you to about 1000 entries IIRC, and SQL Server limits it to 512 or thereabouts. It's just a bad approach. You want to refactor this to use a transaction and JDBC update batches, to gain the benefits of batching without the stack overrun problems. If you're concerned about speed you could try benchmarking to find the optimum size for the number of items in the "IN (...)" clause, but in our testing the optimum number for most databases was 1. For PG I think it was 2. Moral of the story: it's hard to beat individual batch deletes. An alternative approach would be to add these doomed PK's to a temporary table and then do "DELETE FROM myTable WHERE pk IN (SELECT victimId FROM temp_doomed_table)" -- Mark On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 14:18 -0400, Cox, Brian wrote: > The following fails with a "stack depth limit exceeded": > > DELETE FROM some-table WHERE pk IN (pk1, pk2, ..., pkN) > > where pk = primary key and N is large, may be > 50000. > > Is there some limit as to the number of rows that can > be deleted in a single DELETE? > > Thanks, > Brian > >
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: