Re: database contest results
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: database contest results |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1156874131.13414.10.camel@dogma.v10.wvs обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: database contest results (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: database contest results
Re: database contest results Re: database contest results |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 19:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
> > Clearly, there is a huge difference in the overall application. The
> > PostgreSQL entry was done quickly, and the author probably didn't
> > understand the terms of the contest entirely, let alone have the time
> > to optimize his entry.
>
> I don't think you should make these kinds of insulting judgements
> without research.
>
The author himself said he didn't have time. I didn't mean to be
insulting, and I apologize if I was. 120 versus 3000 seems like the
MySQL entry guys were operating with an entirely separate set of
assumptions, and spent much more time optimizing it and determining the
exact contest requirements.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: