Re: Standby Mode
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Standby Mode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1154584860.2495.4.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Standby Mode (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Standby Mode
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > [I have an outstanding question on how to include LWlock support into > > the archiver, required to flesh out the feature set, and of course > > assuming these patches being accepted.] > > The archiver is deliberately designed not to be connected to shared > memory. If you want to change that you'll have to make a very strong > case why we should give up the safety and security advantages of it. We should let the user decide. If archiver_timeout is a server start GUC then we can attach to shared memory if it is set, if not we avoid that. If they are in a position to want that functionality they can make that trade-off. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: