Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test
От
korryd@enterprisedb.com
Тема
Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test
Дата
Msg-id
1154175513.7099.51.camel@sakai.localdomain
Ответ на
Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test (Bruce Momjian)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test failures Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test failures Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test korry <korry@appx.com>
Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression test "korryd@enterprisedb.com" <korryd@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [PATCHES] Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Re: [PATCHES] Possible explanation for Win32 stats "korryd@enterprisedb.com" <korryd@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [PATCHES] Possible explanation for Win32 stats regression Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Is anyone working on this? Tom Lane wrote: > korry <korry@appx.com> writes: > > The problem is that, each time you go through > > pgwin32_waitforsinglesocket(), you tie the *same* kernel object > > (waitevent is static) to each socket. > > > The fix is pretty simple - just call WSAEventSelect( s, waitevent, 0 ) > > after WaitForMultipleObjectsEx() returns. That disassociates the socket > > from the Event (it will get re-associated the next time > > pgwin32_waitforsingleselect() is called. > > Hmm. Presumably we don't do this a whole lot (use multiple sockets) or > we'd have noticed before. Perhaps better would be to keep an additional > static variable saying which socket the event is currently associated > to, and only issue the extra WSAEventSelect calls if we need to change > it. Or is WSAEventSelect fast enough that it doesn't matter? >
Here's a simple patch that fixes the problem (I haven't explored the performance of this patch compared to Tom's suggestion).
-- Korry
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления