Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1152.1208476576@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DROP DATABASE vs patch to not remove files right away
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Patch attached that does the three changes we've talked about:'
> - make ForgetDatabaseFsyncRequests forget unlink requests as well
> - make rmtree() not fail on ENOENT
> - force checkpoint on in dropdb on all platforms
This looks fine as far as it goes, but I'm still thinking it's a bad
idea for rmtree() to fall over on the first failure. I propose that it
ought to keep trying to delete the rest of the target directory tree.
Otherwise, one permissions problem (for example) could lead to most
of a dropped database not getting freed up,
If there aren't objections, I'll make that happen after Heikki applies
his patch.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: