Re: pg_dump design problem (bug??)

On 06/27/2006 09:29:36 AM, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> So, what about it?
>
> I periodically encounter with the same problem. People (e.g. me :-)
> but not only) expect that  when they use pg_dump to backup some
> database (either schema only or both schema and data), all database
> properties will be dumped and, then, restored.
>
> People think that this thing seems to be gotcha. Anyway, if we can
> assign variable's value to database, it makes this value to be the
> property of database and, therefore, should be dumped...

There are obvious acceptable work-arounds, but none (AFIK) that don't
involve having to manually look through a bunch of pg_dumpall output
if you want to restore just one database.  There are only 2 real
choices, either pg_dumpall takes an option to specify just one
db be dumped, or pg_dump takes a flag that allows "alter database"
into the output and pg_restore takes a flag that ignores
such "alter database" information.  I'd prefer
pg_dump/pg_restore, it has the advantage
of producing a single file per db.  (Humm, it'd probably
be best if the pg_restore flag only worked on
-F c style data.)

The real question is whether the pg developers would
object to such a feature, whatever the design is,
or whether it's just that nobody's
gotten around to writing it.

Karl <kop@meme.com>
Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
                  -- Robert A. Heinlein