Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1150998486.745.150.camel@home обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:42 -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote: > On 6/22/06, Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> wrote: > > If you INSERT into multiple partitions (by time -- say one per minute) > > and TRUNCATE periodically (30 minute old partitions for 30 minute > > expiry) it works much better. Expiring the session is quite fast as well > > since they'll go away with the truncate. > > Forgive me if this sounds rude because I'm not meaning it as such, but > this suggestion sounds like a MySQL-ish hack. No doubt it would work, > but should an application-writer have to incur the cost of writing > something different because the database can't handle it? I remember > having to write subselect code in PHP because MySQL couldn't do it... > not what I would call a *solution* by any mean. Application writer doesn't need to do anything. That's what rules, views, etc. are for. The only snag is that PostgreSQL doesn't 'eliminate' a partition by itself, so the truncate is a manual requirement. --
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: