Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> However, if the new hstore type (compatible with the old one) is the
> wrapper around jsonb, rather than the other way around, I don't see any
> problem with it at all. Most future users are almost certainly going to use
> the json interfaces, but we don't want to leave upgraded users behind. (But
> of course it has to actually maintain backwards compatibility for that
> argument to hold)
Yeah --- all of this turns on whether hstore improvements can be 100%
upwards compatible or not. If they are, I don't object to including them;
I'd have said it was wasted effort, but if the work is already done then
that's moot.
regards, tom lane