Re: RES: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI
От | Mark Lewis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RES: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1149281044.20798.116.camel@archimedes обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RES: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI (<carlosreimer@terra.com.br>) |
Ответы |
RES: RES: RES: Initial database loading and IDE x SCSI
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 17:37 -0300, carlosreimer@terra.com.br wrote: > Many thanks Mark, > > I will consider fsync=off only to do an initial load, not for a database normal operation. > This approach works well. You just need to remember to shut down the database and start it back up again with fsync enabled for it to be safe after the initial load. > I was just thinking about this hipotetical scenario: > a) a restore database operation > b) fsync off > c) write-back on (IDE) > > As I could understand, in this sceneraio, it´s normal the IDE drive be faster than the SCSI, ok? > If fsync is off, then the IDE drive loses its big advantage, so IDE and SCSI should be about the same speed. > Of course, the database is exposed because of the fsync=off, but if you consider only the system performance, then it istrue. Isn´t it? > Thanks, > > Reimer > >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: