On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 00:15, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 10:19:25AM +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 23:55, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > > BTW, there's a bug/issue with CLUSTER that makes it not entirely
> > > > transaction safe.
> > >
> > > For God's sake, don't fix that one ! I rely on it... now seriously,
> > > until there's a way to tell the DB that an exclusive lock is enough to
> > > vacuum all dead rows, even if they would be visible by other
> > > transactions, CLUSTER is the only thing I can use to circumvent the long
> > > running transaction syndrome.
> >
> > I believe it's already fixed in HEAD/8.2.
>
> If it is, TODO doesn't reflect that:
>
> * Make CLUSTER preserve recently-dead tuples per MVCC
> requirements
Can I ask to leave in some kind of switch (configuration, syntax, I
don't care) so that the old behavior is still available if needed ?
Thanks,
Csaba.