Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
Дата
Msg-id 1147375664.28245.53.camel@localhost.localdomain
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table  (Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org>)
Ответы Re: XLOG_BLCKSZ vs. wal_buffers table
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 09:55 -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > Could you turn full_page_writes = off and do a few more tests? I think
> > the full page writes is swamping the xlog and masking the performance we
> > might see for normal small xlog writes.
> > I'd try XLOG_BLCKSZ = 4096 and 8192 to start with. Thanks.
> 
> Ok, got data for XLOG_BLCKXZ at 4096, 8192, and 32768 with
> full_page_wirtes = off.  The new data is at the bottom of the page:
>     http://developer.osdl.org/markw/pgsql/xlog_blcksz.html

Mark,

What do you think is causing the step changes at 30+ and 60+ minutes on
these tests?

--  Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: hashagg, statistisics and excessive memory allocation
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sblock state on FreeBSD 6.1