Re: string primary key

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Marlowe
Тема Re: string primary key
Дата
Msg-id 1147365657.9755.69.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на string primary key  (Mark Gibson <mark@gibsonsoftware.com>)
Ответы Re: string primary key  (Mark Gibson <mark@gibsonsoftware.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 10:52, Mark Gibson wrote:
> Is there a disadvantage to having the primary key for a table be a text
> type vs. an integer type?  Performance?  Any difference between having a
> varchar or char as a primary key?
>
> My instinct tells me that an integer is preferred, but I'm looking for a
> more concrete answer.

If you need a unique constraint on the text field anyway, and it's a
natural key, you're generally better of using that field as the pk.

However, if it's not a natually unique key, then it shouldn't be the pk,
and int is a perhaps better choice.

There are two VERY oppositional schools of thought on natural versus
artificial keys out there, and neither side is likely to change their
minds.

My preference is generally for artificial keys (i.e. sequence generated
ones) because I've had requirements change underfoot too many times to
rely on natural keys all the time.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Gibson
Дата:
Сообщение: string primary key
Следующее
От: Blair Lowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump and grants to PUBLIC