Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11457.1104520876@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> We know it's broken and won't be fixed for 8.0.
> If we just #ifndef WIN32 the definitions in utils/mb/encnames.c it won't
> be possible to select that encoding, right? Will that have any other
> unwanted effects (such as breaking client encodings)? If not, I suggest
> this is done.
I believe the subscripts in those arrays have to match the encoding
enum type, so you can't just ifdef out individual entries.
> (Or perhaps something can be done in pg_valid_server_encoding?)
Making the valid_server_encoding function reject it might work.
Tatsuo-san would know for sure.
Should we also reject it as a client encoding, or does that work OK?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления: