Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Дата
Msg-id 11457.1104520876@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Ответы Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32  (Roland Volkmann <roland.volkmann@gmx.de>)
Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers-win32
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> We know it's broken and won't be fixed for 8.0.

> If we just #ifndef WIN32 the definitions in utils/mb/encnames.c it won't
> be possible to select that encoding, right? Will that have any other
> unwanted effects (such as breaking client encodings)? If not, I suggest
> this is done.

I believe the subscripts in those arrays have to match the encoding
enum type, so you can't just ifdef out individual entries.

> (Or perhaps something can be done in pg_valid_server_encoding?)

Making the valid_server_encoding function reject it might work.
Tatsuo-san would know for sure.

Should we also reject it as a client encoding, or does that work OK?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
Следующее
От: Roland Volkmann
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32