Re: Identical query on two machines, different plans....

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Csaba Nagy
Тема Re: Identical query on two machines, different plans....
Дата
Msg-id 1145541970.3553.36.camel@coppola.muc.ecircle.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Identical query on two machines, different plans....  (Csaba Nagy <nagy@ecircle-ag.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
OK, I marked the wrong row counts, but the conclusion is the same.

Cheers,
Csaba.


> > QUERY PLAN
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  Index Scan using ticketing_codes_uq_value_group_id on ticketing_codes
> > (cost=0.00..6.02 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.104..0.107 rows=1
>                    ^^^^^^
> > loops=1)
> >    Index Cond: (((code_value)::text = 'C7ZP2U'::text) AND (code_group_id
> > = 1000))
> >  Total runtime: 0.148 ms
> > (3 rows)
> >
> >
> > PLAN
> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  Bitmap Heap Scan on ticketing_codes  (cost=2.01..1102.05 rows=288
>                                                             ^^^^^^^^
> > width=4) (actual time=88.164..88.170 rows=1 loops=1)
> >    Recheck Cond: (((code_value)::text = 'C7ZP2U'::text) AND
> > (code_group_id = 1000))
> >    ->  Bitmap Index Scan on ticketing_codes_uq_value_group_id
> > (cost=0.00..2.01 rows=288 width=0) (actual time=54.397..54.397 rows=1
                     ^^^^^^^^
> > loops=1)
> >          Index Cond: (((code_value)::text = 'C7ZP2U'::text) AND
> > (code_group_id = 1000))
> >  Total runtime: 88.256 ms
> > (5 rows)
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mario Splivalo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Identical query on two machines, different plans....
Следующее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inserts optimization?