Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1145198880.3273.46.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with PITR? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is full_page_writes=off safe in conjunction with
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 11:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I am thinking we should throw an error on pg_start_backup() and > > pg_stop_backup if full_page_writes is off. > > No, we'll just change the test in xlog.c so that fullPageWrites is > ignored if XLogArchivingActive. I can see the danger of which you speak, but does it necessarily apply to all forms of backup? > > Seems archive_command and > > full_page_writes can still be used if we are not in the process of doing > > a file system backup. > > Think harder: we are only safe if the first write to a given page after > it's mis-copied by the archiver is a full page write. The requirement > therefore continues after pg_stop_backup. Unless you want to add > infrastructure to keep track for *every page* in the DB of whether it's > been fully written since the last backup? It seems that we should write an API to allow a backup device to ask for blocks from the database. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: