Re: WIP: splitting BLCKSZ
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: splitting BLCKSZ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1144163115.13549.499.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: splitting BLCKSZ (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: splitting BLCKSZ
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 19:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Wong <markw@osdl.org> writes: > > Here's an updated patch with help from Simon. Once I get a test system > > going again in the lab I'll start posting some data. I'm planning a > > combination of block sizes (BLCKSZ and XLOG_BLCKSZ) and number of WAL > > buffers. > > Applied with minor corrections (you missed pg_resetxlog, for one). Thanks. (That omission was mine, not Mark's.) On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 18:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I can't see any very good reason > why data block size and xlog block size were ever tied together, and I > think it'll make the code read better if they're separated. I see you've changed the control file back from XLOG_BLCKSZ to BLCKSZ; I wasn't sure which one of those to choose. Perhaps that also should be changed to PGCONTROL_BLCKSZ to more clearly differentiate that also (but not put it in pg_config_manual.h? Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: