"Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes:
> The WIP patch looks good to me. I haven't yet tested it (will wait for the
> final version). The following pointer arithmetic caught my eye though.
> ! nunused = (end - nowunused);
> Shouldn't we typecast them to (char *) first ?
No ... we want the number of OffsetNumbers, not the number of bytes.
regards, tom lane