Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1141914173.1716.12.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL committer history? (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL committer history?
Re: PostgreSQL committer history? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 01:19, Neil Conway wrote: > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 01:38 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Is it as simple as "if nobody objects within 24 hours, apply"? > > I don't think the bottleneck is in patch *application* -- applying a > patch without inspecting its contents doesn't take very much time, and > there's quite a few community members who could do it. The shortage is > of people who have the skills to review patches, and I don't see an easy > way to resolve that. > I've often wondered how much it would help to have more committers for the purpose of having people review & apply smaller patches on their own, there by reducing the "busy work" from Tom, Bruce, et al who we really would rather focus on bigger patches. Ie. many of us could probably review patches for programs like psql, createdb, etc..., is it really more helpful for those patches to have a followup email from someone saying "looks good"? Wouldn't it be more productive to have that follow up email to be a "patch applied" message? Robert Treat -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: