On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 10:26 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Not very much. I think the biggest risk is user confusion, but I
> don't
> think that's a huge risk because I don't think this scenario will
> come
> up very often. Also, it's kind of hard to imagine that there's a
> security model here which never does anything potentially surprising.
Alright, let's just proceed as-is then. I believe these patches are a
major improvement to the usability of logical replication and will put
up with the weirdness. I wanted to understand better why it's there,
and I'm not sure I fully do, but we'll have more time to discuss later.
Regards,
Jeff Davis