On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 13:20 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Move btbulkdelete's vacuum_delay_point() call to a place in the loop where
> we are not holding a buffer content lock; where it was, InterruptHoldoffCount
> is positive and so we'd not respond to cancel signals as intended. Also
> add missing vacuum_delay_point() call in btvacuumcleanup. This should fix
> complaint from Evgeny Gridasov about failure to respond to SIGINT/SIGTERM
> in a timely fashion (bug #2257).
Cool and Interesting. That might explain some pretty dire performance
numbers from last week while running auto vacuum. Performance was
flat-lining for a while. Still need to investigate further though.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs