Re: Clog handling on exec'ed backend
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Clog handling on exec'ed backend |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11399.1051927439@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Clog handling on exec'ed backend (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Clog handling on exec'ed backend
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> It basically makes one of the Clog data structures into a shared memory
> area when using exec (EXEC_BACKEND is defined). It passes all the
> regression/initdb tests on Unix.
It would be cleaner to make the array of LWLockIds part of ClogCtlData,
if you're going to do it that way. I have doubts that pushing all
LWLockIds into shared memory is a feasible solution, however.
Out of curiosity: have you actually tested any of this Windows code
you're proposing to commit? A lot of it looks to me like it's not
gonna work --- stuff is getting done too soon or too late. For
example, I don't see how a backend is going to read GUC variables
when it doesn't yet know where the data directory is.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: