Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeffrey W. Baker
Тема Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Дата
Msg-id 1138737838.5648.4.camel@toonses.gghcwest.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries  ("Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com>)
Ответы Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries
Список pgsql-performance
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 09:00 -0800, Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Jim,
>
> On 1/30/06 12:25 PM, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> wrote:
>
> > Why divide by 2? A good raid controller should be able to send read
> > requests to both drives out of the mirrored set to fully utilize the
> > bandwidth. Of course, that probably won't come into play unless the OS
> > decides that it's going to read-ahead fairly large chunks of the table
> > at a time...
>
> I've not seen one that does, nor would it work in the general case IMO.  In
> RAID1 writes are duplicated and reads come from one of the copies.  You
> could alternate read service requests to minimize rotational latency, but
> you can't improve bandwidth.

Then you've not seen Linux.  Linux does balanced reads on software
mirrors.  I'm not sure why you think this can't improve bandwidth.  It
does improve streaming bandwidth as long as the platter STR is more than
the bus STR.

-jwb

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Delete me
Следующее
От: "Luke Lonergan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Huge Data sets, simple queries