On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 10:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > Hmmmm...actually. It's because I have a user called 'support' and a
> > group called 'support'.
>
> It's possible to support this: the group
> and the user will now really be the same entity, ie a role that has both
> its own login privileges and members.
>
Assuming you actually want to unify the two objects. That might well be
the common case, but will it always be true?
cheers
andrew