Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures
| От | Marcos | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1138004054.949.10.camel@servidor обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) | 
| Ответы | Re: [PERFORMANCE] Stored Procedures | 
| Список | pgsql-performance | 
Em Sex, 2006-01-20 às 15:34 -0600, Jim C. Nasby escreveu: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:38:23PM +0100, Rikard Pavelic wrote: > > This would solve problems with prepare which is per session, so for > > prepared function to be > > optimal one must use same connection. > > If you're dealing with something that's performance critical you're not > going to be constantly re-connecting anyway, so I don't see what the > issue is. This one was my doubt, perhaps in based desktop applications this is true, but in web applications this is not the re-connecting is constant :(. Then the preprare not have very advantage because your duration is per session. Marcos.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: