Re: more C99 cleanup
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: more C99 cleanup |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1136414.1764050035@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: more C99 cleanup (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 21.11.25 17:10, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Ah, there are several. It's not totally obvious perhaps where the
>> cause is. I'll attach the diffs just for the archives' sake.
> For clarification, does what you are showing mean that the regression
> tests have enough coverage of the hypot() edge cases?
We are definitely covering it. It's just that the present tests
fail in a way that wouldn't scream "hypot is broken" to some
future hacker dealing with such a failure. Not sure if that's
worth worrying about; but I'd lean to not worrying unless you
commit and we see such failures in the buildfarm.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: