Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1135983021.5052.94.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 16:14 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > This was discussed on-list by 2 core team members, a committer and > > myself, but I see no requirements change here. You even accepted the > > invisible COPY optimization in your last post - why unpick that now? > > Please forgive my tone, but I am lost for reasonable yet expressive > > words. > > Do you think you are the only one who has rewritten a patch multiple > times? We all have. The goal is to get the functionality into the > system in the most seamless way possible. Considering the number of > people who use PostgreSQL, if it takes use 10 tries, it is worth it > considering the thousands of people who will use it. Would you have us > include a sub-optimal patch and have thousands of people adjust to its > non-optimal functionality? I am sure you would not. Perhaps a company > would say, "Oh, just ship it", but we don't. You're right. Not like we've not been here before, eh? [I'll look at the tech another day] Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: