Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development!
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development! |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 11342.1289956549@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development! (Scott Mead <scott@scottrmead.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with
PostgreSQL development!
Re: Survey on backing up unlogged tables: help us with PostgreSQL development! |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Mead <scott@scottrmead.com> writes:
> +1 -- Is there a technical reason to do a TRUNCATE on restart? I'd feel
> better if I could just have unlogged tables that survive unless something
> like a power-outage etc... I'm in the exact same boat here, lots of big
> logging tables that need to survive reboot, but are frustrating when it
> comes to WAL generation.
Keep in mind that these tables are *not* going to survive any type of
backend crash. Maybe my perceptions are colored because I deal with
Postgres bugs all the time, but I think of backend crashes as pretty
common, certainly much more common than an OS-level crash. I'm afraid
you may be expecting unlogged tables to be significantly more robust
than they really will be.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: