Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1133550065.16716.16.camel@jd.commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
> OK, updated text: > > --with-openssl build with OpenSSL support > --with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline > --without-readline do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing > --without-zlib do not use Zlib This all seems kind of extra... Why not just: --with-libedit Use libedit instead of readline --with-readline Use readline instead of libedit (default) --without-readline Use when readline is not available Joshua D. Drake > -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: