Re: Numeric 508 datatype
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Numeric 508 datatype |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1133513834.2906.523.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Numeric 508 datatype (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 23:34 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Where are we on this patch? It is ready for the patch queue? It's good to be applied, AFAIK. > Simon Riggs wrote: > > As previously agreed, reviewing this is a 2 stage process: > > 1. review/possibly agree OK to commit > > 2. check with everybody on GENERAL that the restriction to 508 is > > acceptable > > > > Figure there's no point doing (2) until we agree the proposal/code is > > workable. I was hoping you'd give me a "this looks good enough to apply" thumbs-up, then I'll ask for comments via a Weekly News item. If I ask for comments and then it is technically rejected we would be wasting everybody's time. Best Regards, Simon Riggs
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: