Re: autovacuum stuck on a table for 18+ hours, consuming lots of CPU time

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: autovacuum stuck on a table for 18+ hours, consuming lots of CPU time
Дата
Msg-id 11335.1322017061@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на autovacuum stuck on a table for 18+ hours, consuming lots of CPU time  (Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: autovacuum stuck on a table for 18+ hours, consuming lots of CPU time  (Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Lonni J Friedman <netllama@gmail.com> writes:
> When I strace PID 30188, I see tons of this scrolling past quickly,
> but I'm not really sure what it means beyond a 'Timeout' not looking
> good:
> select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 32000}) = 0 (Timeout)
> lseek(95, 753901568, SEEK_SET)          = 753901568
> read(95, "\202\1\0\0\260\315\250\245\1\0\0\0\220\0\360\20\360\37\4
> \0\0\0\0p\237\0\1\360\236\0\1"..., 8192) = 8192
> lseek(95, 753917952, SEEK_SET)          = 753917952
> read(95, "\202\1\0\0 N\253\245\1\0\0\0\220\0\360\20\360\37\4
> \0\0\0\0p\237\0\1\360\236\0\1"..., 8192) = 8192
> select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 32000}) = 0 (Timeout)

I'm betting the selects are implementing vacuum_cost_delay, and that
the reason this is taking forever is that you have that cranked up
to an unreasonably high value.  There's no evidence of looping in
what you showed us, because the seek addresses are changing.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: synchronous replication + fsync=off?
Следующее
От: Lonni J Friedman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum stuck on a table for 18+ hours, consuming lots of CPU time