Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions?
Дата
Msg-id 11326.1368039883@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions?  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions?  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> odd that stable function is inlined but immutable isn't!

Well, it knows that the expansion to to_date() would only be stable not
immutable (because to_date depends on some GUC settings), so doing the
expansion could change the behavior, eg by preventing constant-folding.

Although usually wrapping a stable function in an immutable one is a
recipe for disaster, we don't forbid it because there are cases where it
makes sense --- for instance, you might know that the function really is
immutable *in your usage*, and want to use it as an index function or
some such.  But the SQL-function wrapper adds a lot of overhead.  I
think a plpgsql wrapper would be better here, if you need to cheat about
the mutability.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Does it make sense to break a large query into separate functions?
Следующее
От: Tyson Maly
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question on most efficient way to increment a column