Re: [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal
Дата
Msg-id 1132129863.3388.109.camel@holly
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:58 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> In fact there's no problem because in D, just like in template1, all
> tuples are frozen.  How should we mark this on the catalogs?  I don't
> see any way.

All tuples might be frozen or might not be, the point is you don't know.
That's why you can't use FrozenTransactionId.

> > Perhaps we should reinstate VACUUM FULL FREEZE to do just a FREEZE with
> > a table lock and skip all that moving data around.
>
> Doesn't work either because of the argument above.
>
> What about assuming that if somebody executes a database-wide FREEZE, he
> knows what he is doing and thus we can mark datminxid as
> FrozenTransactionId?

If you lock the table before FREEZE then you will guarantee that all
rows will be frozen and you really can then set FrozenTransactionId.

Making VACUUM FREEZE take full table locks seems like a very useful
thing to me, and it would solve your problems also.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs


В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [DOCS] pl/pgSQL doco patch
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal