Re: why vacuum
От | Mario Splivalo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1130497783.23377.16.camel@ekim обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why vacuum (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: why vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 11:51 -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Well, AFAIK Oracle itself offers no replication, either. If you want > it, you have to buy a license for it. Which means it's an add-on. > Heck, most Linux distributions' kernels don't offer support for > network cards: they're an add-on. We call them modules. (In case > it's not clear, I don't buy the "itself/add-on" distinction. The > point is that the whole system works together. PostgreSQL most > definitely offers replication. In fact, you can get warm-standby with > WAL shipping, or read-only capabilities with Slony or some other > tools.) I wish I was Dumbo now. I could hide myself with me ears :) > > I'll be glad to, I'm just not that familiar (in fact, i'm not familiar > > at all) with the 'proof-of-cocept' or 'General Bits' terms, so if you > > could http-redirect me, I'll be most thankfull. > > Proof of concept is just a description of what you did, how it > worked, design and limitations, &c. Post it to the lists (uh, > -general or maybe -hackers, I suppose), or put it on a web page or > whatever. General Bits is a fairly regular column that Elein Mustain > puts out. I bet she'd include a submission on this topic, although > you'd have to ask her. You can find GB at > <http://varlena.com/varlena/GeneralBits/>. I'll go trough my code, it's been a while since I touched it, I'll write some documentation and I'll inform the comunity. Thnx for the pointouts. Mike -- Mario Splivalo Mob-Art mario.splivalo@mobart.hr "I can do it quick, I can do it cheap, I can do it well. Pick any two."
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: