Re: why vacuum
От | Mario Splivalo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: why vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1130401371.31435.17.camel@ekim обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: why vacuum (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: why vacuum
Re: why vacuum |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 12:09 -0400, Jan Wieck wrote: > > > > You must have missed the FAQ and other side notes about replication in > the MySQL manual. Essentially MySQL replication is nothing but a query > duplicating system, with the added sugar of taking care of now() and > some other non-deterministic things, but not all of them. > > Non-deterministic user defined procedures, functions and triggers will > simply blow MySQL's sophisticated replication apart. > That is just not true. I haven't tried MySQL 4 and above, but in 3.5.x replication wos working as expected, and the load that replication posed was insignificant. The only TRUE problem was that replication was unidirectional. That SAME problem has Slony, and other 'replication systems' available for postgres. Mike -- Mario Splivalo Mob-Art mario.splivalo@mobart.hr "I can do it quick, I can do it cheap, I can do it well. Pick any two."
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: